Showing posts with label Acquittal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Acquittal. Show all posts
Saturday, 23 July 2022
(IPC) – S 302/34 - Murder - Common intention- HELD the evidence available on record was not looked into as the witnesses had already been exposed to the accused in the police station - After all, the test identification parade is only a part of an investigation, and therefore, nothing more can be attached to it - Acquittal
Saturday, 23 February 2019
Friday, 22 February 2019
Murder—Identification of Accused—Specific identification of the four accused, from a group of 200- to 300 rioters, with 100% perfection; without a mention of any distinguishing marks seems highly improbable—Accused acquitted. Murder—Test Identification Parade—No reasonable explanation provided for such an inordinate delay of 55 days in conducting the TIP— Accused acquitted Murder—Gunshot Injury—Both the Post -Mortem report and the F.S.L. report are incompatible with each other with regard to exit wound and recovery of bullet—Accused acquitted. Murder—Benefit of doubt arising out of inefficient/defective investigation must be bestowed upon the accused.
Friday, 15 February 2019
Murder--Dying Declaration—Acquittal- -Inconsistencies between dying declarations as recorded by Doctor and as recorded by Executive Magistrate (Tehsildar)--High Court acquitted accused by extending benefit of doubt—Held; when there are two reasonable views and the High Court adopted on possible view then no interference is called for in appeal
Tuesday, 12 February 2019
Law on circumstantial evidence when it comes to fixing guilt on those accused in a criminal case can be summarised in the following manner. “The law can be summarised in the following terms: 1. The circumstances relied upon by the prosecution which lead to an inference to the guilt of the accused must be proved beyond doubt; 2. The circumstances should unerringly point towards the guilt of the accused; 3. The circumstances should be linked together in such a manner that the cumulative effect of the chain formed by joining the links is so complete that it leads to only one conclusion i.e. the guilt of the accused; 4. That there should be no probability of the crime having been committed by a person other than the accused.“
Saturday, 9 February 2019
Acquittal--A judgment of acquittal passed should not be interfered with when two views are possible. Benefit of doubt--When trial Court finds so many infirmities in the prosecution version then trial Court left with no choice but to give benefit of doubt to accused--Acquittal by trial Court should not be interfered with unless it is totally perverse or wholly unsustainable.
Monday, 4 February 2019
Sunday, 3 February 2019
Friday, 25 January 2019
Sunday, 13 January 2019
Murder—Death Penalty—The conduct of the convict in prison cannot be lost sight of and is a relevant mitigating factor Duty of Court—It is duty of Court to be constitutionally correct even when its view is counter-majoritarian the public opinion Murder—Death Sentence—Possibility of Reform—Probability and possibility of reform of a criminal can be done properly only through psychological/psychiatric evaluation--Media Trial-It has almost become a trend for the investigating agency to present their version and create a cloud in the collective conscience of the society regarding the crime and the criminal
Saturday, 12 January 2019
Sunday, 6 January 2019
Saturday, 5 January 2019
Common Intention --Unless a common intention is established as a matter of necessary inference from the proven circumstances, the accused person will be liable for their individual acts and not for the act done by any other person.Appeal against conviction--Appellant acquitted by trial Court--High Court convicted the appellant--Held, if two reasonable views are possible on the basis of the evidence on record and one favourable to the accused has been taken by the trial court, it ought not to be disturbed by appellate Court--
Criminal Law --Murder--Circumstantial evidence--Last seen theory--Deceased last seen with accused--Held, The last-seen theory, furthermore, comes into play where the time gap between the point of time when the accused and the deceased were last seen alive and the deceased is found dead is so small that possibility of any person other than the accused being the author of the crime becomes impossible
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)