Supreme Court of India Judgements

Showing posts with label Panchayats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Panchayats. Show all posts

Sunday, 23 December 2018

Panchayat Law—No Confidence Motion—President ofpanchayat well knowingly participated in the meeting and the resolution was passed against her—After losing in the voting process, the challenge cannot be made to the procedure of calling the meeting

sclaw.in
at December 23, 2018
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Panchayats
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
  • Home
  • Supreme Court of India Judgements - Complete text

Topical Index

  • Accident Cases
  • Acquittal
  • Anticipatory Bail
  • Arbitration
  • Bail
  • Bail - Cancellation
  • BNS
  • BNSS
  • C P C
  • Cheque Dishonour
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Constitution of India
  • Consumer
  • Contempt of Courts
  • Contrat Act
  • Corporate Cases
  • Corruption Cases
  • Cr P C
  • Customs Act
  • Dowry Death
  • Election Laws
  • Environment
  • Evidence Act
  • FSSA
  • I P C
  • IBC
  • Labour Cases
  • Land Acqusition
  • Limitation
  • Maintenance
  • Matrimonial
  • Murder Cases
  • Narcotics
  • Panchayats
  • Preventive Detention
  • Property Matters
  • Registration Act
  • Rent Cases
  • SARFAESI
  • SC/ST
  • SEBI
  • Service Matters
  • Specific Performance
  • State Laws
  • Transfer of Property Act
  • Value Added Tax
  • Will & Succession

Followers

Search This Blog

Conviction under pre-amendment SC/ST Act S. 3(2)(v) requires proof that the victim’s caste identity was a ground for the offence, not merely known.

 RAJU @ UMAKANT Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ( Before : Sanjay Karol and K. V. Viswanathan, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No…..of 2025 (@ Special...

  • Prevention Of Corruption Act | 'Demand & Acceptance Of Bribe Not Proved In Trap Case'
      The Supreme Court recently acquitted two government employees accused of demanding and accepting bribe after noting that the prosecution f...
  • Sale Under Power Of Attorney Unaffected By Subsequent Cancellation Of PoA
     The Supreme Court has observed that sale transactions carried out on the basis of a valid Power of Attorney (PoA) cannot be sought to be se...
  • Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 — Sections 11 & 165(6)(ii) — Revenue Officers — Collector — Competence of Additional Collector
     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. DINESH KUMAR AND OTHERS ( Before : Sudhanshu Dhulia and K. Vinod Chandran, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No......of 20...

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • May 2025 (3)
  • April 2025 (52)
  • March 2025 (62)
  • September 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (7)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (18)
  • February 2019 (84)
  • January 2019 (84)
  • December 2018 (77)
@ 2025 manpreetsinghsood.in . Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.