Supreme Court of India Judgements

Showing posts with label Panchayats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Panchayats. Show all posts

Sunday, 23 December 2018

Panchayat Law—No Confidence Motion—President ofpanchayat well knowingly participated in the meeting and the resolution was passed against her—After losing in the voting process, the challenge cannot be made to the procedure of calling the meeting

sclaw.in
at December 23, 2018
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Panchayats
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
  • Home
  • Supreme Court of India Judgements - Complete text

Topical Index

  • Accident Cases
  • Acquittal
  • Anticipatory Bail
  • Arbitration
  • Bail
  • C P C
  • Cheque Dishonour
  • Constitution of India
  • Consumer
  • Contempt of Courts
  • Corporate Cases
  • Cr P C
  • Dowry Death
  • Election Laws
  • Evidence Act
  • I P C
  • Labour Cases
  • Land Acqusition
  • Limitation
  • Maintenance
  • Matrimonial
  • Murder Cases
  • Narcotics
  • Panchayats
  • Preventive Detention
  • Property Matters
  • Rent Cases
  • SARFAESI
  • Service Matters
  • Specific Performance
  • State Laws
  • Will & Succession

Followers

Search This Blog

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 36(3) - for grant of stay in the case of an arbitral award for payment of money, due regard has to be given to the provisions for grant of stay of a money decree under the provisions of the CPC.

 A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 36 - Section 9 of the Arbitration Act confers wide power on the Court to pass or...

  • (IPC) – S 302/34 - Murder - Common intention- HELD the evidence available on record was not looked into as the witnesses had already been exposed to the accused in the police station - After all, the test identification parade is only a part of an investigation, and therefore, nothing more can be attached to it - Acquittal
     
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.42--Secret Infor­ mation-Law summed up-An empowered officer under Section 42(1) is obli­ gated to reduce to writing the information received by him, only when an of­ fence punishable under the Act has been committed in any building, convey­ ance or an enclosed place, or when a document or an article is concealed in a building, conveyance or an enclosed place. Compliance with Section 42, in­ cluding recording of information received by the empowered officer, is not mandatory
    sclaw.in
  • IBC – when admission is opposed on the ground of existence of an award or a decree in favour of the Corporate Debtor, and the Awarded/decretal amount exceeds the amount of the debt, the Adjudicating Authority would have to exercise its discretion under Section 7(5)(a) of the IBC to keep the admission of the application of the Financial Creditor in abeyance
      ibcode.ind.in 

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • September 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (7)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (18)
  • February 2019 (84)
  • January 2019 (84)
  • December 2018 (77)
@ 2018 sclaw.in . Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.