Showing posts with label I P C. Show all posts
Showing posts with label I P C. Show all posts
Monday, 11 March 2019
Monday, 25 February 2019
Sunday, 24 February 2019
Criminal Law--Murder--Common intention--Prosecution case that appellant alongwith other accused murdered the deceased--Evidence of PWs 2 and 3 did not attribute any overt act to the appellant--Mere fact that he was in the company of accused who were armed would not be sufficient to attract Section 34 I.P.C.--It is undisputed that appellant was not armed and he has no animosity with the deceased
Second Complaint—There is no provision in the Criminal Procedure Code or any other statute which debars a complainant from making a second complaint on the same allegations, when the first complaint did not lead to conviction, acquittal or discharge Second Complaint—The failure to mention the first complaint in the subsequent one is inconsequential—Mentioning of reasons for withdrawal of an earlier complaint is also not a condition precedent for maintaining a second complaint.
Friday, 22 February 2019
Identity of victim of sexual offences—Directions issued that no person can print or publish in print, electronic, social media, etc. the name of the victim or even in a remote manner disclose any facts which can lead to the victim being identified and which should make her identity known to the public at large.
Saturday, 16 February 2019
Wednesday, 13 February 2019
Criminal complaints cannot be quashed only on the ground that the allegations made therein appear to be of a civil nature. If the ingredients of the offence alleged against the accused are prima facie made out in the complaint, the criminal proceeding shall not be interdicted.” “At the initial stage of issuance of process it is not open to the Courts to stifle the proceedings by entering into the merits of the contentions made on behalf of the accused.” If the ingredients of the offence alleged against the accused are prima facie made out in the complaint, the criminal proceeding shall not be interdicted.”
Monday, 11 February 2019
According to Exception I to Section 300 IPC, culpable homicide is not murder if the offender causes the death of the person who gave the provocation, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation. However, the First Proviso to Exception I provides that the provocation should be one which is not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for killing or doing harm to any person.
Sunday, 10 February 2019
Tuesday, 5 February 2019
Sunday, 3 February 2019
Reduction in Sentence- -Accused set fire to the house of complainant who received burn injuries in the incident—Cattle of complainant died due to burn injuries—Keeping in view that incident is of the year 2000 and complainant has paid Rs. 9 lakhs as compensation to complainant sentence of 7 years reduced to 5 years.
Wednesday, 30 January 2019
Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.376—Rape—Consensual Sex—Live-in Relation— Quashing—Held; (i) If the accused has not made the promise with the sole intention to seduce the prosecutrix to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape. (ii) The acknowledged consensual physical relationship between the parties would not constitute an offence under Section 376 of the IPC.
Tuesday, 29 January 2019
Sunday, 27 January 2019
Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302--Murder--Death Sentence converted into life imprisonment-Duty is on the State to show that there is no possibility of reform or rehabilitation of the accused—When the offence is not gruesome, not coldblooded murder, nor is committed in a diabolical manner, the court will impose life imprisonment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)