Monday, 31 December 2018
Territorial Jurisdiction--Ouster clause--Agreement between parties that only Courts at Jaipur alone would have jurisdiction--Even though Courts at Calcutta would have jurisdiction but in view of ouster clause it would only the Courts at Jaipur which would have jurisdiction to entertain such proceeding.
Accident--Owner of vehicle already dead--Vehicle not transferred in the name of his heirs--Insurance renewed in the name deceased owner--Accident took place and driver died--No witnesses examined by insurance company that they were not aware about death of original owner--Compensation rightly granted to wife of deceased driver.
Cancellation of Bail--Complainant can always question the order granting bail if the said order is not validly passed--It is not as if once a bail is granted by any Court, the only way is to get it cancelled on account of its misuse--Bail order can be tested on merits also--Complainant could question the merits of order granting bail-- Penal Code, 1860, Section 302--Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439(2).
Marriage--Nullity of--A Christian married to a Hindu in a temple and subsequently marriage was registered under Section 8 of Hindu Marriage Act--Marriage was a nullity and its registration could not validate the same. Marriage--Conditions for--Usage of expression "may" in the opening line of Section 5of Hindu Marriage Act does not make the provision optional.
Dishonour of Cheque--Breach of trust--Loan advanced by appellant to respondent--Respondent issued cheques--Loan amount not repaid and cheques presented got bounced--Complaint under Section 138 by appellant against respondent pending--Respondent does not dispute issuance of cheques--Ingredients of section 406 IPC not made out against appellant.
Sunday, 30 December 2018
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.39 R.I & R.2 and O.41 R.23--Injunction- Temporary Injunction—Rejection of stay application—Remand of Case- Held; No adequate reason is given in the impugned order for not granting stay; and secondly, the reason given does not in itself justify the rejection having regard to the nature of controversy involved in the writ petition- Case remanded to be decided afresh.
Arbitration Agreement—Arbitration clause has to be interpreted strictly-- the insurance company has completely denied their liability and repudiated the claim of respondents—Therefore, making the arbitration clause ineffective and incapable of being enforced—Reference to arbitration cannot be made—Directed accordingly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)